Don’t get Madget EQUALSupport a Citizens' Initiatives Amendment to Curb Special Interests & Improve Congress.

This Amendment is to improve representative government—not to weaken it but to make it stronger. Main
Menu:

Home Amendment Campaign Practical Issues Accessories

  Constitutional checks and balances are no longer adequate and need amending.
Contingency Initiative Costs

Accessories Sub Menu:
 

Download Key Docs Links FAQs Information Pages Accessibility Privacy Copyright About Us Purpose of Site Glossary Help Send Comments Alphabetical Index Sub Topics Index Table of Contents Search This Site

 

Information
Pages

Sub Menu:

Click browser BACK button to return.
Declaration of Independence Annapolis 1786 Federalist No. 10 Federalist No. 39 Federalist No. 42 Federalist No. 43
Federalist No. 45 Federalist No. 49 Federalist No. 85 James Madison
June 6,
1787
James Wilson
1790-1791
Gettysburg Address
Preamble Article I
Section 1
Article I
Section 2
Article I Section 3 Clause 6 Article I Section 8 Clause 18 Article I Section 10 Clause 3
Article IV Article V Article VII Amendment I Amendment X Extracts from State Constitutions
Ludlow 1938 Koupal 1977 Hoekstra 1994 Canady-Bliley 1998 PST&T v Oregon 1912 Cooley - People's Sovereignty
Wisconsin Application 1911 Apply by Initiative for Convention  Ratification by State Referenda Mullen v Howell 1919 Herbring v Brown 1919 Maine Opinion of the Justices 1919
Hawke v Smith 1920 Eisenhower  1961 Term Limits v Thornton 1995 Philadelphia II v. Gregoire 1996 Line Item Veto Clinton v NY 1998 CRS Report Durbin May, 1995
Cities with Initiatives States with Initiatives States with Referendums Public Support for Initiatives California Citizens' Assembly How Democratic Was Athens?
E-voting and Elections Contingency Initiative Estimate Reelection  Quotations Athenian Constitution  

 

States with Initiatives
Project Cost Estimates

This table shows the estimated funding that could be needed for contingency initiative projects in States that have the initiative process but whose legislatures are reluctant to endorse the Amendment.

The initiatives would attempt to get the planned U.S. Citizens' Initiatives Amendment adopted-in-principle by any reluctant States and to assure their support for calling an Article V Convention.

CONTINGENCY INITIATIVE COST ESTIMATES
       
STATES WITH DIRECT INITIATIVES INDIRECT INITIATIVES CONTINGENCY
INITIATIVE COSTS
STATE STATUTE CONSTITUTIONAL
Alaska     X 2,700,000
Arizona X X   6,500,000
Arkansas X X   4,300,000
California X X   29,700,000
Colorado X X   5,700,000
Florida   X   15,400,000
Idaho X     3,300,000
Illinois   X   12,000,000
Maine     X 3,200,000
Massachusetts     X 7,200,000
Michigan   X X 10,000,000
Mississippi     X 4,400,000
Missouri X X   6,600,000
Montana X X   2,900,000
Nebraska X X   3,600,000
Nevada   X X 3,900,000
North Dakota X X   2,700,000
Ohio   X X 11,100,000
Oklahoma X X   4,900,000
Oregon X X   5,000,000
South Dakota X X   2,800,000
Utah X   X 4,000,000
Washington X   X 7,000,000
Wyoming     X 2,600,000
24 14 +5 +5 161,500,000
       
Sources of Data:
Schevitz, Jan A., The Fourth Branch of Government. May 2000
Kearsley, Steve, San Francisco Chronicle. May 18-20, 1998
Initiatives & Referendum Institute

Note: The estimates are based on the largest and smallest costs referenced in the sources, and are linearly interpolated on the basis of States' populations.

 

Alphabetical Index Sub Topics Index Table of Contents Search This Site Help Send Comments FAQs

Copyright © 2003-2009,
Citizens for U.S. Direct Initiatives, All Rights Reserved.

www.InitiativesAmendment.org
 www.CUSDI.org       www.BOTUS.org

Version 06.06
 June 26, 2009